Click for home page Office of the Attorney General - State of Texas
John Cornyn

March 9, 2000

Mr. James L. Hall
Assistant General Counsel
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
P.O. Box 4004
Huntsville, Texas 77342-4004


Dear Mr. Hall:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 132803.

The Department of Criminal Justice (the "department") received a request for "the last three security audits and operational reviews conducted at McConnel Prison." You claim that the responsive information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.107, 552.108, 552.110 and 552.131 of the Government Code. You have provided the information to this office for review. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information.(1)

The 76th Legislature amended section 552.022 of the Government Code. In pertinent part this section now reads,

(a) Without limiting the amount or kind of information that is public information under this chapter, the following categories of information are public information and not excepted from required disclosure under this chapter unless they are expressly confidential under other law:

(1) a completed report, audit, evaluation, or investigation made of, for, or by a governmental body, except as provided by Section 552.108

As all of the responsive information falls within the ambit of 552.022(a)(1), only that portion which is confidential or is excepted under section 552.108 may be withheld.

Section 552.108 protects the interests of law enforcement agencies by excepting certain information from disclosure. In pertinent part this section provides,

(b)An internal record or notation of a law enforcement agency or prosecutor that is maintained for internal use in matters relating to law enforcement or prosecution is excepted from the requirements of Section 552.021 if:

(1) release of the internal record or notation would interfere with law enforcement or prosecution.

You have identified information which you contend discloses procedural information the release of which would compromise prison security. This office has stated that procedural information related to law enforcement may, under some circumstances, be withheld under section 552.108 of the Government Code, or its statutory predecessors. See, e.g., Open Records Decision Nos. 531 (1989) (detailed use of force guidelines), 456 (1987) (forms indicating location of off-duty police officers), 413 (1984) (security measures to be used at next execution), 341 (1982) (Department of Public Safety drivers' licenses forgery detection procedures), 143 (1976) (specific operations or specialized equipment directly related to investigation or detection of crime). However, when section 552.108(b) is claimed, the agency claiming it must reasonably explain, if the information does not supply the explanation on its face, how releasing the information would interfere with law enforcement. Open Records Decision No. 434 at 3(1986). In this case, you have not adequately explained how the release of all of the subject information would constitute such an interference, and the interference is not apparent on the face of all of the information. From our review of these materials, we conclude that it has been demonstrated that release of the information identified by you as exhibits 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, in their entirety, and portions of other exhibits as marked by this office, would interfere with law enforcement. This information may be withheld under section 552.108 of the Government Code. The remaining responsive information has not been demonstrated to be excepted by section 552.108 of the Government Code.

You also contend that responsive information may be withheld under section 552.131 of the Government Code. In pertinent part this section provides,

(a) Except as provided by Subsection (b) or by Section 552.029, information obtained or maintained by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice is excepted from the requirements of Section 552.021 if it is information about an inmate who is confined in a facility operated by or under a contract with the department.

(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to:

(1) statistical or other aggregated information relating to inmates confined in one or more facilities operated by or under a contract with the department.

From our review of the information at issue, we conclude that, although it includes references to specific inmates, the information is presented in the aggregate as contemplated by subsection 552.131(b)(1). Therefore the 552.131(a) exception to disclosure does not apply to this information.

You raise section 552.110 of the Government Code, apparently contending that security related policies may be excepted as "trade secrets." Section 552.110(a) excepts from disclosure "[a] trade secret obtained from a person and privileged or confidential by statute or judicial decision." The Texas Supreme Court adopted the following definition of "trade secret" from Restatement of Torts section 757 comment b (1939) any formula, pattern, device or compilation of information which is used in one's business, and which gives him an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it. It may be a formula for a chemical compound, a process of manufacturing, treating or preserving materials, a pattern for a machine or other device, or a list of customers. It differs from other secret information in a business . . . in that it is not simply information as to a single or ephemeral event in the conduct of the business . . . . A trade secret is a process or device for continuous use in the operation of the business. . . . [It may] relate to the sale of goods or to other operations in the business, such as a code for determining discounts, rebates or other concessions in a price list or catalogue, or a list of specialized customers, or a method of bookkeeping or other office management Hyde Corp. v. Huffines, 314 S.W.2d 763, 776 (Tex.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 898 (1958).

The following criteria are used to determine if information constitutes a trade secret:

(1) the extent to which the information is known outside of [the company];

(2) the extent to which it is known by employees and others involved in [the company's] business; (3) the extent of measures taken by [the company] to guard the secrecy of the information; (4) the value of the information to [the company] and [its] competitors; (5) the amount of effort or money expended by [the company] in developing the information; (6) the ease or difficulty with which the information could be properly acquired or duplicated by others.

Restatement of Torts, supra; see also Open Records Decision Nos. 319 at 2 (1982), 306 at 2 (1982), 255 at 2 (1980).

This office will accept a claim that information is excepted from disclosure under the trade secret aspect of section 552.110 if sufficient facts to establish a prima facie case that the information is a trade secret are alleged and no argument is submitted that rebuts that claim as a matter of law. Open Records Decision No. 552 (1990). However, in this case you have alleged no facts which would establish a prima facie case that any of the subject information is a trade secret. We conclude that none of the subject information may be withheld under section 552.110 of the Government Code.

We note that the submitted information includes social security numbers of employees of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. This information is excepted from public disclosure and must be withheld. Gov't Code 552.117(3).

The submitted materials also include information that is protected by the common law right of privacy. Section 552.101, which excepts confidential information from public disclosure, encompasses the common law right to privacy, to except information if (1) the information contains highly intimate or embarrassing facts the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person, and (2) the information is not of legitimate concern to the public. Industrial Found. v. Texas Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 685 (Tex. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 (1977). In Industrial Foundation, the Texas Supreme Court considered intimate and embarrassing information such as that relating to sexual assault, pregnancy, mental or physical abuse in the workplace, illegitimate children, psychiatric treatment of mental disorders, attempted suicide, and injuries to sexual organs. 540 S.W.2d at 683; see also, Open Records Decision Nos. 470 (concluding that fact that a person broke out in hives as a result of severe emotional distress is excepted by common law privacy), 455 (1987) (concluding that kinds of prescription drugs a person is taking are protected by common law privacy), 422 (1984) (concluding that details of self-inflicted injuries are presumed protected by common law privacy) 343 (1982) (concluding that information regarding drug overdoses, acute alcohol intoxication, obstetrical/gynecological illnesses, convulsions/seizures, or emotional/mental distress is protected by common law privacy). We have marked the submitted materials to indicate the type of information which must be withheld under section 552.101.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. 552.321(a).

If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, within 10 calendar days of this ruling, the governmental body will do one of the following three things: 1) release the public records; 2) notify the requestor of the exact day, time, and place that copies of the records will be provided or that the records can be inspected; or 3) notify the requestor of the governmental body's intent to challenge this letter ruling in court. If the governmental body fails to do one of these three things within 10 calendar days of this ruling, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at 877/673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. 552.3215(e).

If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. 552.321(a); Texas Department of Public Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex. App.-Austin 1992, no writ).

If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling.


Michael Jay Burns
Assistant Attorney General
Open Records Division


Ref: ID# 132803

Encl Submitted documents

cc: Mr. John Tedesco
San Antonio Express-News
P.O. Box 2171
San Antonio, Texas 78297
(w/o enclosures)



1. This ruling does not consider the applicability and effect of the Final Judgment in the case of Ruiz v. Collins, No. H-78-987 (S.D. Tex., filed Dec. 11, 1992), to the information at issue. However, we note that Ruiz is still in effect and it prohibits the release of certain "sensitive information," which may include information required to be released under section 552.029. We remind you that section 552.107(2) of the Government Code requires you to withhold information that is made confidential by court order, and that section 552.352 prescribes criminal penalties for the disclosure of confidential information.

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer

Home | ORLs